Re: New construct discussion Summary (was: what happened to that new isset() like language construct)
| From: | Marcus Boerger | Date: | Tue, 13 Jul 2004 05:32:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New construct discussion Summary (was: what happened to that new isset() like language construct) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-11149@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Andi,
wow i didn't remember seeing that. So with default being a
reserved word to me it seems like one of the best choices.
Monday, July 12, 2004, 10:01:47 PM, you wrote:
> It's a reserved word so I doubt it'll break scripts.
> Andi
> At 05:37 PM 7/12/2004 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>Hello Derick,
>>
>>Monday, July 12, 2004, 11:21:06 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> >> Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> >> > How about default($var, expr)?
>> >>
>> >> It might be a good idea to decide on a name for the construct before
>> >> the PHP 5.0.0 release in order to make it a reserved word (marked for
>> >> future use).
>>
>> > Agreed, and I also like default()
>>
>>The problem with default() is that there will be tons of scripts out there
>>that will be broken by this. Hence i'd like to see a more non intuitive
>>name (like the ifsetor). Probably getvalue() was the best compromise so
>>far.
--
Best regards,
Marcus mailto:helly@php.net