Re: what happened to that new isset() like language construct
| From: | Marc Richards | Date: | Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:13:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: what happened to that new isset() like language construct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-11000@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Marcus Boerger wrote:
it would allow two versions by having the default optional: 1) $a = ifsetor($b) 2) $a = ifsetor($b, NULL)Me either. What I am saying is that there is no need for two versions. $a = $b ?: NULL; is as concise as the first version, and as explicit (in terms of the NULL) as the second. Marc$a = $b ?: NULL;How would the operator do the second? Will it look like the following? $a = $b ?:; I defitively don't want that.