Re: fd patch
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 20 May 2003 02:48:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: fd patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-1756@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 05:32 20/05/2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Just a last heads up before the release here. Do we really want this patch
in? I think that it was put in a bug-fix release in a rather hasty manner,
with no real reason. We've already experienced one crash, there may be
others - it's a very central piece of code.
Yes, it is indeed very central and that is the reason why the
old code caused so much trouble for a long, long time.
It definitely wasn't too much trouble, there was next to no complaints about it.
It
fixes a nasty limitation on an important platform. Certain
SAPI modules like NSAPI, AOLserver, Apache 2 and thttpd are
severely affected by this issue - they are basically useless
on Solaris.
Most of these SAPIs have been basically useless on all operating systems until recently. Most of them are still not considered stable for production use because of other threading issues. Despite this long list of SAPIs, Apache 1.x SAPI users far outnumber the users of these SAPIs.
I had no doubt that you'd defend the introduction of this patch, you wouldn't have introduced it otherwise. I'm more interested in hearing what other people think, as I think they weren't made aware of the scope of the problem and the risks involved.
Zeev