Re: Re: Hold off 5.4
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:11:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Hold off 5.4 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-50533@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:05:43 -0000, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Davey Shafik wrote:
> >
> > > The goal then was to essentially take the 5.3 branch, create a 5.4
> > > branch, cherry pick commits to trunk and apply them to the 5.4
> > > branch and end up with a stable build. Unfortunately, subversion
> > > merging sucks.
> >
> > This has nothing to do with any sort of version control sucking.
> > Cherry picking is hard! It only works if you get one feature in one
> > commit, instead of many several, with other changes in between,
> > without many dependices between patches. PHP isn't like that,
> > especially with Dmitry's engine changing patches.
>
> Yes, cherry picking is not as easy as people assume they are, because
> many changes depend on each other and trunk has a fair quantity of
> these.
>
> I think trunk should be the starting point for 5.4; as to type
> hinting, I'm neutral as to the status quo.
Yes, I also think trunk should be 5.4. It's not the most ideal thing
though, but something we'll have to live with. It's going to be a lot
less of a hassle than cherry picking trunk's features and graft them
onto 5.3.
> However, this is all orthogonal to this thread, what's important is
> that we agree on the formalities proposed so that we can proceed to
> these material issues.
I don't know. The release process discussion can run at the same time
and be ready for 5.5. That even allows us to refine it while we're
trying out the current proposal.
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug