Re: HTML_Template_IT cooperation status, competitive package proposal

On Sun Mar 16, 2003 at 01:3658PM +0100, Lukas Smith wrote: > > Do I have a voice in general PEAR decisions, too? > > Yes. This is correct until a certain point. But everybody should be aware of the fact that there will always be leaders in every project and that they will make the final rules. It's simply impossible to satisfy the needs and wishes of *everybody*. > One possible solution would be to write an RFC about how you would like > PEAR to be regulated. Please don't set up yet another RfC. My main concern about the PEAR meeting is, that there will be zillions of people on IRC with a zillion of different opinions, how all want to broadcast their opinion of how PEAR should be. This will make the whole meeting absolutely useless. > At the PEAR meeting I hope to get a good number of PEAR people together > so we can then talk about all the recent ideas that have popped up. The > PEAR meeting will be held in Amsterdam as you know but will be > broadcasted to that people can participate via IRC. I know that this sounds a bit rude, but what do you think of making the IRC channel invite-only? This way we can concentrate on the essential things like Christian's PFC suggestion. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/