Re: Re: [midgard-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Midgard in the sky with ... PEAR?
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Sun, 27 Apr 2003 18:50:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [midgard-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Midgard in the sky with ... PEAR? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15614@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
<smith@backendmedia.com> wrote :
>> From: Martin Langhoff [mailto:ml@nzl.com.ar]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:25 PM
>
>> - the CVS repository is _not_ PEAR, but project-specific
>
> one thing that would be great however is to have all pear packages, even
> if they are developed outside of PEAR to be in a cvs repository that
> would send commit messages to pear-cvs. I think this is pretty critical
> in order to prevent diverging efforts and for generally having a central
> place to keep up on pear developments.
>
> I don't know how easily this can be achieved with the currently used or
> generally existing cvs commit mail scripts. But I think it would be
> great if horde and midgard could set this up. Obviously we are only I
> interested in the packages in your cvs that are pear packages and not in
> the framework specific things.
>
> Also we do have a few packages that are not in pear cvs that are
> maintained totally separate (maybe even without any CVS) .. Var_Dump
> comes to mind. Should we maybe make it a requirement for released
> packages to be in some cvs repository? I wouldn't think that this would
> be stepping on anyones toes, since we are not requiring it to be ours.
> We just want to hear how development is going via the commit messages.
+1, this should be a requirement unless a good reason is given (I don't know
how to use CVS is not a good reason ;) ).
Bertrand Mansion
Mamasam