Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Packages and documentation (was: [Call for Votes] XML_Statistics)

>> What about a rule stating that a package can not get the status >> stable if there is no approved documentation ? SH> So, let me rephrase this: you essentially want to punish SH> productive people by labeling their stable, high-quality working SH> software unstable; you aren't willing to devote either money or SH> resources into improving their package, however, because you don't SH> have exactly what you want, you will mislabel the package in order SH> to demotivate them into doing what you want. OK, forget my whole post and delete it. I thought it was possible to contribute a piece of advice from a personal experience, but it looks like it's impossible.