Re: Re: HTML_Table: thead, tfoot and tbody

On 7/31/2005 4:30 AM, Helgi Þormar spake the following words: > On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 23:59 +0200, Mark Wiesemann wrote: >>Christian Weiske wrote: >>>>How about allowing the $row and $col params in >>>>set{Header/Body/Footer/Cell}Contents() to be null? E.g.: If $col = null >>>>then the content should go in every col of the specified row. >>>>Accordingly for the cases $row = null and ($row = null && $col = null). >>> >>>Yes, that is a quite neat solution. >>>Only: Where to pass the offsets? >> >>I talked to Christian off-list: my suggestion with the null values was >>based upon a missunderstanding. >> >>So my new suggestion (agreed by Christian) is to use $col as the offset >>value if $contents in set{Header/Body/Footer/Cell}Contents() is an >>array. Example: >> >>$table->setCellContents(3, 2, array('A', 'B', 'C')); >>==> row 3, col 2 = 'A' >> row 3, col 3 = 'B' >> row 3, col 4 = 'C' > > This sounds nice, plus the other things said before, I'm going out of > town for 3-4 days in couple of hours so I can't do anything then please > email me the patch + doc changes (well the doc changes can go to the doc > list after the patch is added really) when you have it ready :) +1 here, too :) I've been lurking, even if I haven't said anything on the subject just yet. That sounds like a good implementation. I'd have probably thought of adding an additional instance of HTML_Table to the object for the header and the footer, but if we can do without it, it would save time and memory. Klaus