Re: Re: HTML_Table: thead, tfoot and tbody
| From: | Mark Wiesemann | Date: | Fri, 05 Aug 2005 11:47:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: HTML_Table: thead, tfoot and tbody | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39246@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> So the consensus is to use three arrays like $_tHead, $_tBody and
> $_tFoot if the new constructor param tells us to use the three groups,
> and to use $_structure like before if the new constructor param isn't
> set?
>
> Maybe I have an error in reasoning (dict.leo.org tells me that this is
> the translation for german "Denkfehler") but doesn't this require to
> change many functions?
>
> E.g: function setRowType($row, $type) has this line of code:
> $this->_structure[$row][$counter]["type"] = $type;
>
> But here $row (maybe = 1) is non-ambiguous because it could be row 1 in
> <thead>, <tbody> or <tfoot>. And it also must take into accout that it
> has to write to $_tHead, $_tBody or $_tFoot if the new constructor param
> is true.
>
> Tell me if I'm on the woodway!
Nobody has an opinion on this? Christian? Klaus? Helgi? Bertrand? Anybody
else?
Mark