Re: wiki for PEAR

--On September 29, 2006 3:11:52 PM -0400 David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote: > Yeah but no one seems to want to discuss or actually try to organize > anything, I think we should defenatly talk about a plan of action but > everyone is taking the way they want.. I agree that we need to organize and prioritize activity and ideas. I disagree that "no one seems to want to discuss or actually try to oranize anything"... Recent (day or two) discussion on this list about web site issues has spurred active work directly on web site improvements. Greg Beaver and a handful of others are actively working: - hardware for the server - web site (the implementation needs to be fixed so it's easier for user to contribute to the web site) These two steps are difficult for "all of us" to work on. Once progress is made, we can begin prioritizing/rethinking/bagging/whatever ideas like. A wiki, a forum, improvements to documentation, "working groups" or empowered categories -- or any of a number of other ideas that went up (pictures flares) in the last day or two. I suggest: We [the entire community] continue working in the frameworks we have at the moment. (No tossing out of babies with the bathwater!) So we work in the mailing lists. We work in the proposal system. (Anyone: Any other de facto communication tools we already use that I'm oblivious to?) To wit, I just submitted a PEPr proposal RFC. -c