Re: Documentation..
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:28:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation.. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2059@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 21:06, Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
> > My proposes:
> > - short and descriptive essay about "what is QA here" (highest
> > priority);
>
> A draft was worked on in Frankfurt at the phpconf, which can be found
> here [1] and for which you are more than welcome to comment.
>
> It explains what QA will do.
>
> > - weekly based QA reports (highest priority);
>
> We'll give that some thought, at the moment the work done isn't so
> astounding as to require it though.
>
> > - tracker to handle QA requests (high priority);
Handles what QA has been doing, outlined in the RFC iirc, that way the
weekly report could be made more easily I guess.
>
> What do you mean by QA request ?
>
> > - assure dialog between users and developers productive, effective and
> > easy (mainsteam activity); that means to improve relations between
> > both, so nobody will be forced but can act without inner conflicts on
> > the issues arised. That can make everybody more happy, than it is now.
>
> Not sure about this one.
>
> > - give users ability to vote (lowest priority)
>
> On ?
Probably on QA matters, if it's important enough it will most likely I
guess be made into a RFC, thus all devs can vote.
(Saying what *I* think, not the QA team)
> > I hope that you will not send me to "write it now". I believe. =)
>
> Not at all.
>
> As a side note I'm only expressing *my* opinion and not that of the QA
> team :)
>
> > t
>
> [1]
> http://pear.dnsalias.net/yawiki/index.php?area=Main&page=QARoadMaps