Re: Documentation..

From: Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:28:52 +0000
Subject: Re: Documentation..
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2059@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 21:06, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > My proposes: > > - short and descriptive essay about "what is QA here" (highest > > priority); > > A draft was worked on in Frankfurt at the phpconf, which can be found > here [1] and for which you are more than welcome to comment. > > It explains what QA will do. > > > - weekly based QA reports (highest priority); > > We'll give that some thought, at the moment the work done isn't so > astounding as to require it though. > > > - tracker to handle QA requests (high priority); Handles what QA has been doing, outlined in the RFC iirc, that way the weekly report could be made more easily I guess. > > What do you mean by QA request ? > > > - assure dialog between users and developers productive, effective and > > easy (mainsteam activity); that means to improve relations between > > both, so nobody will be forced but can act without inner conflicts on > > the issues arised. That can make everybody more happy, than it is now. > > Not sure about this one. > > > - give users ability to vote (lowest priority) > > On ? Probably on QA matters, if it's important enough it will most likely I guess be made into a RFC, thus all devs can vote. (Saying what *I* think, not the QA team) > > I hope that you will not send me to "write it now". I believe. =) > > Not at all. > > As a side note I'm only expressing *my* opinion and not that of the QA > team :) > > > t > > [1] > http://pear.dnsalias.net/yawiki/index.php?area=Main&page=QARoadMaps

« previous php.pear.qa (#2059) next »