Re: Re[2]: [PEAR-QA] Documentation..

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:25:42 +0200, anatoly techtonik <techtonik@php.net> wrote: > Hello Lukas, > > >>>However - it would probably also be a good idea to make a user > >>>submitted examples section or something like that for the most lazy > >>>developers.. > > >> I will second this suggestion, because I knew this from Agilent VEE, > >> where user contributed examples where shipped out with the full version. > > LS> why not just open a feature request with a link to the source ... i > LS> doubt any developer wouldnt be happy to add the example to the distro > LS> after a quick look over the source. > > Because it is not a feature request and dumb users like me are either > too lazy to contribute to stale closed community or don't have a proper > amount of imagination to draw association between Feature Request > and Example. It can be my only IMHO, but (RFE != Example for existing > feature). Stale? Closed? Are you trying to be a troll? If something hasn't been updated then point it out and it will be dealt with. QA is doing a good job trying to get maintainers for abandoned packages. *People are busy*. You have to understand that this is all done *for free*. This e-mail wasn't meant as a personal attack. Lukas suggested that you create a bug report with the example. It's the best place to put things like this. He was informing you, not criticising you. > > PHPDOC already has the solution. It is user notes. > It has been implemented for pearweb, but not put into production yet. Any status on this? Last I heard it needed more testing... -- Justin Patrin