Re: Re: [Proposal] id3v1

You both have excellent points. Maybe it would be better for me to remove the id3tag support from the code I've written and just stick to the reading/writing parts. If someone needs to read and write both the sound data and id3 tags then they can just install the two extensions. Even though that was a bit of a pre-mature proposal it generated some good feedback. I'll keep the list posted on my progress when I get back from vacation. Justin > Reading/writing id3 tasks can be done with some quite simple operations, > so I'd prefer to do this as a standalone extension. I just took a look > at L.A.M.E. and although it looks good, it's quite huge. For reading and > writing the id3 tags, only one file of the lib would be needed, so I > think it's better to implement this directly in the extension. > > Nevertheless, it would be interesting to have a second extension, which > is able to not only read the id3 tag, but the whole MP3 stream or other > audio files. > I could offer you my help on this, although I'm quite new to pecl... > > Stephan