Re: We Want Quality

On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote: > Following up: A discussion of communication models, > perception and intention. > > Well, sure. If you want to read these rules as being > oppressive and inpolite, you can do so, because they are > context free. Many words do not transfer any information. In > easily memorizable rules, such words are omitted. Since you're not an army commander, you're not exactly in a position to lay out the rules in an easy-to-memorize fashion without even discussing it with us first. It just looks bad. If we discuss it and arrive to a concensus or an understanding, then summarizing it in short rules makes sense. You don't begin with a summary though. > You are assuming > > Developing equals being able to commit. > > While it makes collaborating with other people harder > (assuming they have no tools like email, diff, patch), I > think it is an acceptable trade-off. From my experience, it isn't. Zeev -- Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> http://www.zend.com/