Re: We Want Quality
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Thu, 29 Jun 2000 20:57:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: We Want Quality | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-dev+get-22963@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> > At 01:44 PM 6/29/00 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > >On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Jason wrote:
> > > > Sign me up.
> > >
> > >Ok, what would be a good starting point? Perhaps, taking PHP 3's test
> > >suite and modifying it?
> >
> > From my experience regression tests are crap. They barely catch anything.
> > Having testers run RC's on their development sites (real life scripts) is
> > probably the best regression test you can do.
>
> Regression tests are useful to avoid that a bug returns.
>
> For example, for each bug fixed in the GNU C library, you
> have a test case. If that bug returns, it will be catched
> and fixed immediately.
True. And that's not too shocking that we already discussed that ages
ago, and decided that each and every solved bug report that involved a fix
would semi-automatically become a test case. We've had this decision, we
even have the resolutions online on the Web. Somebody that will actually
execute them is what's missing.
Zeev
--
Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
http://www.zend.com/