Re: Release?
| From: | Steph Fox | Date: | Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:28:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Release? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.gtk.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-4061@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It's not just that - it's more that if we're saying it works with GTK 2.6 up it should work for _everybody_ with GTK 2.6. up. There's a free compiler available for Windows now, so we're seeing more and more doze users picking up the cudgels these days.
Does anybody know where all that generator code for Drawable_Arg is used? I'm having trouble tracking it down, but it could be 'cos I'm still mucking about with 2.6 here. Do later GTKs use it? (NB - I can't see where it's called from elsewhere in the generator either - and it makes no difference to the gen files, which is a bit of a clue.) It's mostly that that's breaking E_STRICT compatibility.
- Steph
----- Original Message ----- From: "Anant Narayanan" <anant@kix.in>
To: "Bob Majdak Jr" <bob@kateos.org>
Cc: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>; "Andrei Zmievski" <andrei@gravitonic.com>; "Elizabeth M Smith" <auroraeosrose@gmail.com>; "PHP-GTK dev" <php-gtk-dev@lists.php.net>
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP-GTK-DEV] Release?
This might be a silly question... but if I recall right the last build Elizabeth did was Unzip and go all self contained on Windows, did not interact with the system GTK... so... why not just /give/ them Gtk 2.12. Then everyone will be using a PHP-GTK2 with max features for max lawlz without borking the system.Giving them GTK 2.12 would be a bad move as not even 10% of the new classes have been implemented. We shouldn't go beyond 2.8. Cheers, Anant