Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps outthere)

From: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:09:34 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps outthere)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-20385@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Christian Schneider wrote: > Just to illustrate some question which could be raised to weaken your point > that Date is the one and only name for that class: > Why does it include time as well, shouldn't it be Datetime (a la SQL)? Is it > going to be the only class in ext/date (no, there is already timezone)? => > Shouldn't it be Date_Timezone and Date_Date/Date_Datetime then? No, why should it? We reserve the right to use whatever name we want in the core (although prefixing internal classes with Pear would be sneaky ;-) ) > > No no, the core reserves the right to name whatever they want, it's the > > userland code that is responsible for prefixing their classes. > > Is that why function names were prefixed? Or __get? No, that's for logic's sense. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org

« previous php.internals (#20385) next »