Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps outthere)
| From: | Andrei Zmievski | Date: | Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:17:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps outthere) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-20479@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Derick,
I am not sure where you came up with this idea, but it's patently untrue. Core and userland have to co-exist, and that means cooperation, not blatant disregard for thousands of users out there. Unless you're speaking only for yourself, and in that case, I hope your upcoming vacation is a good one, cause you need to de-stress, or something.
- Andrei
On Nov 25, 2005, at 4:09 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
No, why should it? We reserve the right to use whatever name we want in the core (although prefixing internal classes with Pear would be sneaky ;-) )No, that's for logic's sense. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpNo no, the core reserves the right to name whatever they want, it's the userland code that is responsible for prefixing their classes.Is that why function names were prefixed? Or __get?