Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break tousands of apps out there)

On Friday 25 November 2005 12:25, Oliver Grätz wrote: > Just two cents from a user's point of view: If you had put all the time > you invested in this flame war about ONE class into already introducing > namespaces (e.g. Core\Date or Core:Date or Core::Date, with a notev that > I hate the \ syntax) with 5.1.0, it could have been in there already. I can't help but add that I couldn't agree more. This would not have been a problem if namespaces we planned for inclusion in PHP6, and this data change was held back till then. PEAR could be moved to it's own namespace... import net.php.pear.date; For example. Also, with you 100% on the \ syntax. Jessie and others - keep up the good work. As a side note, where is the offical roadmap for the PHP project? what's the nice easy to follow tables that show what features are being planned for future relases and the current state of these features, and who's working on them? If you're not sure what I mean, take a look at how KDE does what's called 'project management' eg: a features plan, where users would have seen that date is forthcoming http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.5-features.html and a nice, clearly formatted release schedue, with ETAs for code. http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.5-release-plan.html -- Ian P. Christian ~ http://pookey.co.uk

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]