Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break thousands of apps out there)

From: Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:53:34 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: PHP 5.1 (Or How to break thousands of apps out there)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-20433@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Andi, Friday, November 25, 2005, 6:43:25 PM, you wrote: > BTW, just to clarify, I am not against a Date class (whatever its > name) in the long run but I think it'd probably be a combination of > work Derick, Pierre and new contributions. Yes from my point of view there could coexist a base class that supports all basic features and an advanced class happily in one php universe and there is even place for peoples own stuff and of course a PEAR_Date (or however named too). The base class could for instance have methods that return iterators for date ranges, say DateRange or DateIterator. That would allow pretty neat code and ease the pain in heavy date dependant code very much. (Actually something i proposed right from the first moment i heared of pecl/date or ext/date). Best regards, Marcus

« previous php.internals (#20433) next »