Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)

From: Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:41:19 +0000
Subject: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-24494@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Steph, we discussed it to death already. Please be realistic.
'Discussed to death', I'd say. There wasn't a decision made, either way, and I for one don't see why PEAR should dictate terms to PHP. - Steph
-Andrei On Jul 18, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Steph Fox wrote:
No kidding, Derick. Go back and read all those discussions. If we want to enable the ext/date classes, they need to be prefixed.
Go back and read Ilia's blog entry on the subject. There were NO bug reports about it, in the 5 days the Date class was 'out there'. Does that sound to you like gazillions of applications were broken?


« previous php.internals (#24494) next »