Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:58:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-24619@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
John Coggeshall wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:44 -0700, Andrei Zmievski wrote:Why would it be PHP::PHPDateTime ? An extra alias here isn't going to hurt very much. We are not talking about hundreds of classes. At this point we are talking about one with a very common short name. -RasmusV6 is not a hindrance to V5 and is at least 9-12 months away (for an alpha).Regardless, we know it's coming and we know it'll have namespacing support. If we do PHPDateTime right now we'll have PHP::PHPDateTime later, and that's just wonky.