Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:06:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-24588@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steph Fox wrote:
> > These two classes need to be renamed if they are to go in
> > and I've proposed 2 different naming conventions just a few e-mails
> > ago. Perhaps if you were to vote on the names or second (or is it
> > 3rd) Pierre' s proposal to shelf date until future releases we can
> > bring this discussion to some sort of a conclusion.
>
> I already agreed with Pierre over this, and offered to support him in giving
> PEAR support for upgrading. So long as it goes in from the start of 5_3
> branch, why not? (Like it should've done at the start of 5_2 already.) I think
> it's worth holding out for a few more months to get sane names in there - and
> the original names are the sanest, least confusing names.
Delaying it to 5.3 is not an option. We already delayed it once.
Derick