Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:06:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-24650@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, John Coggeshall wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 03:29 +0200, Steph Fox wrote:
> > Rasmus, I'm sorry but I can't agree with you. When we get namespacing it'll
> >
> > make perfect sense to have PHP::Foo(). Until then, it makes no sense
> > whatsoever to me to mess about with plain names for root classes. We aren't
> > breaking 'tousands of apps out there' unless someone doesn't bother to read
> >
> > the upgrade guide and happens to have not prefixed their own classes. And if
> > in that situation, all the user needs to do is search and replace, and all
> > _we_ need to do is offer support for that replacement that will work in PHP
> > 4 as well as in PHP 5.2 and beyond.
>
> I agree completely.
And so do I.
Derick