Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)
| From: | Edin Kadribasic | Date: | Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:25:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-24508@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Derick Rethans wrote:
Because PEAR doesn't really work with PHP 5 ;-) (a joke people). But seriously there can be conflicts here, and you can't really disprove that with 5 days of a .0 release...However I do think that "gazillions" is a bit of an overstatement.Sure. FYU it was meant as "many applications". But breaking even a few or "both" is still reckless, irresposible behaviour when all that is needed to fix the breakage is rename the class. Espacially because of all the bad publicity we get for breaking backwards compatibility for no good reason. Edin