Re: Re: PEAR::Date broken (Was: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src(PHP_5_2) /ext/date php_date.c php_date.h)

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 22:25 +0200, Pierre wrote: > - to start using the common names in general without a loud, > "official" and preemptive > warning to our users (meaning not from one minor to another) I think we need people in charge of this specific topic. We're largely developers after all, not public relations managers. > And what I cannot accept is people arguing about PEAR dictating PHP > developments. We do not, but Derick did. So please spare me the > endless "Oh Look! PEAR is crap and evil", it is actually unopportune. I'll assume you didn't mean to imply I said anything close to the sort, but for what it's worth I can't imagine anyone using that as their argument is going to garner much support so may I suggest you leave those who choose to troll alone? > However I don't think that discussing it right before a RC release is > the right time. We better have to remove the controversial part (drop > the class, keep the functions) and take the time to discuss this > problem, generally and not only for Date. Did I miss something, isn't the notion of an impending RC release something we just came up with? We haven't released anything yet and rather then making Derick wait another cycle to get his code that I know he's worked hard to develop out the door, I think we should come to some sort of agreement now. John