RE: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Mon, 09 May 2011 17:33:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52166@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Jones [mailto:christopher.jones@oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 AM
> To: internals@lists.php.net; Guilherme Blanco
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
>
>
>
> On 05/09/2011 07:44 AM,
> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com<mailto:guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It seems to me that you are not interested on user's request and
> > rather accept/implement only what the features that interest you. It's
> > very bad for the language and very bad for all of users.
>
> Rasmus & Stas have already pointed out this is not valid and lots of user
> requests are implemented.
>
> I'd add that PHP has never had a lot of spare developer capacity.
> Programmers are not idly sitting around, waiting for random ideas to code
> up. If you feel strongly about a feature you have to convince the core
> contributors of its merits and (i) pique the interest of someone capable of
> implementing it and then help with testing and documentation, or (ii)
> implement it all yourself.
>
> It's easier than ever to get an SVN account, so contributing would be a good
> way to get karma.
I agree but also want to emphasize that just because there’s a patch it doesn’t mean it’s a
good idea and should be accepted.
Of course like Chris points out it’ll significantly increase the chances of people taking it
seriously and playing around with the idea.
I also think Matthew makes a good point – annotations can be viewed in different ways and arguably
there are already quite a lot of possibilities with what exists today.
Andi