RE: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
| From: | Andi Gutmans | Date: | Mon, 09 May 2011 22:39:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52184@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>-----Original Message-----
>From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com [mailto:guilhermeblanco@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:51 AM
>To: Andi Gutmans
>Cc: Christopher Jones; internals@lists.php.net
>Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
>
>Hi Andi,
>
>That's all I want.
>Someone to at least look at the patch and give me feedback.
>None here did that, all you're doing is telling "no, we don't accept it".
>
>Why don't you give me some valuable feedback so I can work on the patch to
>turn it relevant to you?
I think more important than the patch is the actual functionality. Patch can always be fixed.
I assume the latest RFC is https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations?
I will take a bit of a longer look at it in the coming days but from looking at it quickly I can see
why some people may not be very excited about it. I personally have never been a huge fan of
meta-data whether in the code or outside the code. The biggest scars I carry are from J2EE. I feel
annotations are sometimes just a nicer way of creating similar problems (hard to understand flow,
hard to debug, etc…). I do realize there are also some benefits but as Matthew pointed out the
question is are those benefits enough to warrant a whole new grammar in the language or do we keep
it lighter weight and let people build on that (which with the right caching should not be too
hard).
Anyway, I will take a longer look.
Andi (hoping I don’t get extra newlines this time around. My apologies but for some reason my mail
client doesn’t like internals@ in the past two weeks).