Re: annotations again

On May 11, 2011, at 4:00 AM, dukeofgaming <dukeofgaming@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote: > >> On 05/11/2011 01:39 AM, dukeofgaming wrote: >> >>> The link doesn't work, but I'm assuming it is this one?: >>> https://wiki.php.net/todo >>> >> >> That was supposed to be wiki.php.net/rfc (iPad auto-correct messed it up) >> >> > I see. I have actually read most RFCs, but I do feel something is meesing. > Perhaps if RFCs were categorized by potential release in the wiki —or > alternatively, an additional "Intented PHP version" field— then agreements > coud get easier, because I don't see consistent PHP version information for > RFCs that could lead to an actual roadmap. <snip> Agreed, the RFC wiki namespace is cluttered, and for example year[s] old empty entries even exist there.... Apply for a wiki account, then start hacking :) Regards, Philip