Re: Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers
| From: | Laruence | Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:37:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-66907@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Added new constant CURL_WRAPPERS_ENABLE in (include 5.4)
> >
>
> https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/d7f709a032a40cb475042b43db07a4698a2488b7
>
> I must say the process of how it was done was not very good. Not only
> there were no substantial discussion on adding this new thing in stable
> version before the commit, the time between message announcing it and
> asking if there are any objections and the commit was barely a day. It's
> not enough time at all to solicit feedback, and this change is not
> really something urgent that needs to be committed ASAP. And it turns
> out, there *are* objections. Could we be a little less quick with
> commits into a stable version and give it some time when we're talking
> about new things and not bugfixes?
>
Hey:
I have to say, the objections only shows up after it happens..
but yes, I am a little rush at this commit, that is because, you can
see, the test script in ext/standard/tests/stream is depends on a ugly
trick to skip . it make me very uncomfortable.
I send the mail the day before yesterday, and it's really not a big
change (add a constant), then no new feedback in a day, I think it's okey
to commit.
however, you are right, it's not a long time, so if objections becomes
strong, I can revert it.
thanks
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>
--
Laruence Xinchen Hui
http://www.laruence.com/