Re: Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers
| From: | Hannes Magnusson | Date: | Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:42:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Add a constant to reflect --with-curlwrappers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-66927@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote:
>
>> however, you are right, it's not a long time, so if objections becomes
>> strong, I can revert it.
>>
>
> this is exactly the kind of behavior why we changed from the commit first
> then revert when people complaining to the current approach, where we try
> to reach a concensus (via discussion on the mailing list or voting through
> RFCs) before introducing a change.
I've gotta say, even though I disagree with the commit, writing an RFC
for a new constant is a total WTF.
There is absolutely no need for a RFC for it.
Heck, even that initial curtesy mail was more then I would have expected.
-Hannes