Re: [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC

Hi Nikita, On Fri, August 22, 2014 13:16, Nikita Popov wrote: > Hi internals! > > > Today the int64 RFC has been merged, despite objections regarding the > naming changes it introduces. > > As we were not given a chance to resolve this issue before the merge, a > short proposal has been created, which aims to revert all unnecessary > naming changes and instead use type names that are consistent with the > existing code base and expectations: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/better_type_names_for_int64 > > > Due to the unexpected merge on short notice, with no chance for > discussion, this issue is blocking a number of other patches. As such I > ask if we can move through this RFC with a shortened cycle. I would not > appreciate having to wait three weeks to have a workable codebase again. > > Nikita > to be complete, the RFC probably should take in account several new identifiers which came in (zend_off_t, zend_stat_t and co.). As their naming scheme is probably somewhat different. I've just documented those http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=blob;f=UPGRADING.INTERNALS and continue. Regards Anatol