Re: [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC
| From: | christopher jones | Date: | Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:06:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76813@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 8/22/14, 5:11 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Bob Weinand <bobwei9@hotmail.com> wrote:Since this is obviously contentious it should follow the normal RFC cycle. Chris -- christopher.jones@oracle.com http://twitter.com/ghrd Free PHP & Oracle book: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/php/underground-php-oracle-manual-098250.htmlYes, please. We're all in favor of the 64 bit implementation, but definitely not on the naming. I think it was a big mistake to not separate the naming and implementation votes initially. I also would support a shorter RFC cycle, due to its blocking nature. [Vote in 2-3 days, vote lasting one week as usual]No.