Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Joe Watkins <pthreads@pthreads.org> wrote: > Pierre, > > I wasn't involved in the conversations during it's development very > much. You will have to wait for bob or someone from the phpstorm team to > fill in the blanks. Suffice to say that they found a reason to work on a > new protocol, details I don't know. > > It had it's own remote protocol when it was merged, but it turned out > to be pretty useless for those people interested in using it remotely. > > This is only a development of that original feature. > > I of course recognize that we are in some sense representative of the > PHP project, however, we are talking about words like awesomesauce, not > profanity, or anything offensive whatever. > > Bob done all the work on this, in record time. It's totally crappy that > he'll wake up today to this nonsense, he should be feeling pleased with > himself. He worked very hard on it. Cannot agree more. I very much like phpdbg and really appreciate all the aweome work you guys have put in it. I am only trying to understand this whole protocol thing, in the most objecitve way :). I did not know phpstorm was involved either, that makes me feel better about it. They know very well what is needed and have a very large experience in this area. I am convinced things will be clear soon :) -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org