Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

> Am 26.10.2014 um 16:26 schrieb Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>: > > On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: > >> >>> On 26 Oct 2014, at 15:09, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Joe Watkins wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 23:06 -0400, Derick Rethans wrote: >>>> >>>> A few weeks ago, I was at a conference where you told a room filled >>>> with hundreds of developers that phpdbg was no good, because you >>>> don't know how to use it. >>> >>> I was being polite. I should have told them it is useles for any of >>> our users, instead of blaming it (wrongly) on my own ineptitude. >> >> Perhaps you could’ve actually talked about its benefits. I went to >> that talk too. You showed off stuff vld can do… and neglected to >> mention that phpdbg could do the same things. > > Some of it, certainly. A future version of the talk (ie, next week at > ZendCon) will show the difference, so that the audience can judge for > themselves what is better. > > cheers, > Derick I’m certain it’ll still be biased somehow. Would be great if you could share with us what you’ll tell them, then maybe you can do a constructive talk about it. Thanks, Bob