Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:26:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-78344@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > On 26 Oct 2014, at 15:09, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Joe Watkins wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 23:06 -0400, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >>
> >> A few weeks ago, I was at a conference where you told a room filled
> >> with hundreds of developers that phpdbg was no good, because you
> >> don't know how to use it.
> >
> > I was being polite. I should have told them it is useles for any of
> > our users, instead of blaming it (wrongly) on my own ineptitude.
>
> Perhaps you could’ve actually talked about its benefits. I went to
> that talk too. You showed off stuff vld can do… and neglected to
> mention that phpdbg could do the same things.
Some of it, certainly. A future version of the talk (ie, next week at
ZendCon) will show the difference, so that the audience can judge for
themselves what is better.
cheers,
Derick