Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)
| From: | Remi Collet | Date: | Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:33:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-78441@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 29/10/2014 00:35, Stas Malyshev a écrit :
> Hi!
>
>> phpdbg is under php.net ; every decision about phpdbg should then
>> be debatted with all the team, and new ideas, such as a protocol,
>> RFC'ed, whoever are the maintainers of the code. It's like that
>> for every piece of code, of every extension. This is PHP process.
>> If you dont want to
> Do I understand it right that after all we've being discussing
> here about not putting big new stuff into PHP without discussion,
> we've got new stuff in phpdbg now merged not only to master but
> into the stable branch of 5.6? Am I missing something here?
Can you please consider reverting everything to stable state (5.6.2),
and start discussing about pending changes ?
Remi.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlRQijwACgkQYUppBSnxahiPugCfWBHUcWQlFqq4tx/KrC95VqUK
CsAAoN4YcKahsp3WFIX0CkEA7g7gDhrV
=p9SK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----