Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: > >> On 28 Oct 2014, at 13:43, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote: >> >> When PHP 5.6 has been released, few weeks/months ago, I explicitely >> stated Ferenc (RMing 5.6 together with me), that *it is not a normal >> thing to have an external domain for phpdbg* >> >> This has never happened before, FWIR >> >> Every code that is part of PHP, that is merged into php.net repo , >> falls under the PHP licence *and* the PHP process of doing things. >> >> One chance is that today the subject shows to everybody and not only >> RM wondering about this. Cool. >> I'm all +1 to merge phpdbg web site content into official php.net documentation. >> >> Guys, from an external POV, phpdbg seems very strange for people. Why >> the hell does it have its own github repo and its own website ? This >> is something that has never been seen for *official* php.net content >> and our users are asking questions / assuming things. > > Yeah, I agree this is weird. There’s nothing wrong with keeping around the github repo to > provide phpdbg for older PHP versions, but the main site should on php.net and it shouldn’t tell > the user to go anywhere but php.net. Yes, this has been like that since the beggining of the PHP project. The PHP project is a human, collaborative open source adventure before anything else. The code and the ideas written behind php.net are collaborative and owned by everyone. Julien.P