Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

From: Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:45:55 +0000
Subject: Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-78445@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014, Bob Weinand wrote: > > Am 26.10.2014 um 16:22 schrieb Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>: > > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Joe Watkins wrote: > > > >> We will notify internals of our intentions to make such changes in > >> future, if we thought there was any chance of any feedback before > >> today, we would already be doing so. > > > > "We will notify internals". Really? Sadly, this phpdbg stuff is part > > of internals, so the "we" and "internals" mean the same thing. If > > you want to run this as a private project, get it out of php-src. > > As already said, it was an one-time mistake. If there are any major > things to happen in phpdbg, we’ll drop a mail first here and only > merge after eventual discussion. That's good to hear. But I have been speaking to the PhpStorm people here at ZendCon, and they give a different version of the story why you didn't pick DBGp. From what I understand, having to do another debugging protocol is really the last thing that they want. Drop me a line (privately) to see whether we can resolve the issues with the protocol that you had. cheers, Derick

« previous php.internals (#78445) next »