Re: PHPDBG nonsense (Was: Re: [PHP-CVS] com php-src: Made phpdbg compatible with new engine: ...)

> Am 26.10.2014 um 17:23 schrieb Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>: > > On 26/10/14 15:41, Bob Weinand wrote: >> Ask them at PhpStorm. They were pleased to not have to use DBGp for it. >> They just initially requested it because they didn’t knew any better protocol. That’s >> all. > > PHPStorm like PHP-FIG have their own agendas which do not play well with > other groups of developers. Just because one thinks an idea is good does > not mean that everybody else has to adopt it. So what becomes 'main > stream' has to have common consensus and the voting rules provide that. > > When was the vote on this rework taken? > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk There wasn’t any vote and there won’t. /dev/null likes to listen to your complaints why we should have voted on it. But now it’s in, let’s rather try to improve what’s there than screaming for a vote - it won’t help anyone and hinder possible work on improving the current thing. Next time we’ll put a notice a few days before, it’s promised, yes. Thanks, Bob