Re: an HTML_Template_IT[X] fork is available

> > Okay, enough of that. Every coin has two sides, > > and I also think that Pierre-Alain _might_ have > > judged too quickly. As Christian has pointed > > out in the meantime, while there are some disadvantages > > in the new version, there also are some cool additions > > in there. Why reject additions that make sense just > > because some features don´t? > > That's my position too. I am just angry it's the second time > Alexey comes with a version and is rejected by PA. He > reworked everything he made the first time taking our > comments into consideration. Well. Alexey said in his first mail "I must point out that making a patch against current sources was impractical, as the classes are almost completely rewritten." To me, this means: Take ALL or NOTHING. Breaking BC is no option, so we _need_ to choose "Nothing". Christian Dickmann