Re: Unit tests, was Re: [PEAR-DEV] an HTML_Template_IT[X] fork is available
| From: | Xavier Noguer | Date: | Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:45:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Unit tests, was Re: [PEAR-DEV] an HTML_Template_IT[X] fork is available | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-13181@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
El Mié 12 Feb 2003 06:37, John Luxford escribió:
> >> Christian Dickmann wrote:
> I would say that more importantly than we've held coding standards
> even, we should be holding two things: unit tests and documentation. I
> really hate it when I find a cool PEAR package that sounds like it does
> *exactly* what I need, then find out I have to read the entire source
> to figure out how to use it. And unfortunately at that point, I don't
> take any consolation in the fact that the code is at least "readable"
> according to PEAR standards. ;)
+1 on that. Trying to translate the good intentions into something concrete,
we might agree on using PHPUnit for all testing. I'm not saying anyone should
be forced to make unit tests for existing or proposed packages, just that it
would be a good thing to encourage doing it, and using the existing
infrastructure (PHPUnit) for it.
Xavier