AW: [PEAR-DEV] [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork

Hi, > > You can't be serious! > Adjust your tone. Thanks. This was not meant as an insult. In German it would translate to something like "Das kann doch nicht sein Ernst sein?". I don't think that this is too harsh! (See Klaus' post) > "Documentation in an appropriate format (plain text, docbook) > > Your code must come with appropriate documentation in one of the > following formats: > > - Docbook XML > - Plain Text" > > (http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.contributing.php) > It is pretty funny to see how much developers have actually read the > "Developers Guide" ... In the case of the PHP_Fork proposal docs generated by phpDocumentor 2.2.2 have been available. That means it should be no problem to generate peardoc from the sourcecode. In fact, I thought that this package is really well documented. Regarding my packages, I always add inline docs and as soon as a package is accepted I try to work in the online docs. I do not have the time to do all work at once, and if I can't be sure that the package is accepted, I'm not willing to write documentation that no one will read. Stephan PS: If you need docs in text format, why don't we just use lynx on the HTML version?