Re: [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork

George Schlossnagle <george@omniti.com> escribió > > On Nov 8, 2003, at 9:40 AM, Xavier Noguer wrote: > > > Martin Jansen <mj@php.net> escribió > > > >> (http://pear.php.net/manual/en/developers.contributing.php) > >> > >> It is pretty funny to see how much developers have actually read the > >> "Developers Guide" ... > > > > I've read that guide. I just don't seem to be able to take it > > seriously when > > it lists requirements that have never, as far as I know, been voted by > > the > > pear group or the developer community at large, such as regressions > > tests > > (http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/peardoc/en/guide/developers/ > > contributing.xml?r1=1.8&r2=1.9&ty=h) > > > > Would you be so kind to point me to the pear group document or public > > discussion in which this requirement was approved? > > This was discussed at the PEAR group meeting in Amsterdam this past > spring. It was webcast and had open participation through irc. From http://pear.php.net/news/meeting-2003-summary.php : <quote> A QA team will be formed. It will make sure that quality standards are met. Those standards have yet to be defined more precisely; they should be measurable. They include the following minimum requirements: inline PHPDoc comments, proper summary of the package purpose and a detailed usage example. Further quality criterias are more documentation, user and developer unit tests (using any of PHPUnit or phpt), API stability etc. </quote> As I understand it, a minimum criteria should be required for all package proposals. But "non minimum" criteria should not be required. Am I wrong on this? Xavier http://www.xavier-noguer.com/