Re: [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork
| From: | George Schlossnagle | Date: | Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:16:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-23360@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Nov 8, 2003, at 10:06 AM, Xavier Noguer wrote:
George Schlossnagle <george@omniti.com> escribióI don't know how it evolved from a SHOULD to a MUST. Just reporting it's origins. GeorgeThis was discussed at the PEAR group meeting in Amsterdam this past spring. It was webcast and had open participation through irc.From http://pear.php.net/news/meeting-2003-summary.php : <quote> A QA team will be formed. It will make sure that quality standards are met. Those standards have yet to be defined more precisely; they should be measurable. They include the following minimum requirements: inline PHPDoc comments, proper summary of the package purpose and a detailed usage example. Further quality criterias are more documentation, user and developer unit tests (using any of PHPUnit or phpt), API stability etc. </quote> As I understand it, a minimum criteria should be required for all package proposals. But "non minimum" criteria should not be required. Am I wrong on this?