Re: [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Sun, 09 Nov 2003 01:13:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Call For Votes] PHP::Fork | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-23367@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 8 Nov 2003 at 20:07, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2003, at 7:15 PM, Lukas Smith wrote:
> > <rant>
> > /* ... */
> > </rant>
>
> I feel your rant and concur, but it's a real shame that it may take a
> 'pear2' to fix the situation.
>
> Also a real shame that the confirmation process entails so much
> bickering and posturing. It would be really nice if the majority of
> the qualifications were quantitative, so you could have automatic
> evaluation without so much back and forth.
Agreed with you, George. Founding a "PEAR2" just to start again from
scrath doesn't seem a good idea to me either. It should be possible
to set rules and evalute existing packages one-by-one.
Stefan