Re: future of PEAR
| From: | Greg Beaver | Date: | Tue, 11 Nov 2003 05:09:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: future of PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-23412@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
+1 for new develop role for documentor.
Greg
Xavier Noguer wrote:
Paul M Jones <pmjones@ciaweb.net> escribióWould be good to count.It is in fact harder in a lot of ways. It's like building a business (or more specifically a franchise model business). It requires more patience, more planning, more attention to the not-sexy not-fun stuff like requirements determination and documentation. It's fun and easy to "get started coding!" and not so fun to "get started documenting!". That is the challenge any serious form of PEAR2 would face, and not many are up for it.About the undocumented stable packages. What happened to the idea of giving recognition to package documentors (as a developer role)? It might prove useful if we plan on getting more people to help documenting. And by the way, does anyone know how many pachages are in this state?