Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:47:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-30515@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 11 June 2004 11:00 am, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
> Following up on the licensing/copyright discussion...
>
> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 10:36:56PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> > On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:45:11PM -0700, Ian Eure wrote:
> > > Yes, this is how I interpret it - that copyright notice says that the
> > > license text is copyrighted by the PHP Group.
> >
> > I'm willing to wager two beers[1] that the copyright notice is about the
> > code and not the license itself.
>
> On this segment of the discussion, considering the people who stared PEAR
> are folks deeply involved in the PHP Group, I'm thinking that the header
> text currently put forth by the coding standards was copied verbatim from
> files that the PHP Group acually has copyright on. Therefore, the
> "Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group" is merely an artifact.
>
Yes, this is my understanding as well. Unfortunately, that wording is in the
standard header required to be on all PEAR sources.
Anyone care to write up a RFC on the issue?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAyf45xuUdPD6j2IMRAr8+AKC7DopCck+de1hVnbntA4IPp6ycrgCgt98t
3x2nc+fuPPNxYLiweFQdqxs=
=rZYS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----