Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Sun, 30 May 2004 03:45:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29800@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 29 May 2004 07:33 am, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
> On 29 May 2004 at 10:20, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> > I'm not so sure about that. The header at the top of the file says:
> > Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group
> >
> > While you may retain the copyright on the original work, that you no
> > longer retain copyright control over the version released under the PHP
> > License.
> >
> > Further, read the PHP License at
> > http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt says
> > Copyright (c) 1999 - 2004 The PHP Group. All rights reserved.
> > and then outlines how the contents may be utilized, distributed, etc.
>
> I think you're hunting in the wrong direction. This is the license-
> copyright ... done by the makers of the license. Imho it hasn't
> directly got to do with the code you put under that license. It's not
> that you donate the code to the PHP group (like if you would sell it)
> - you keep the copyright and only use the licensesing terms that
> somebody else has put together.
>
Yes, this is how I interpret it - that copyright notice says that the license
text is copyrighted by the PHP Group. The copyright on the code /cannot/ be
owned by the PHP Group unless it is signed over.
Any differing opinions, or can we put this issue to bed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAuVjJxuUdPD6j2IMRAofoAKDYur3soRU4gQ6ilrnLrshqS4cssQCg6etK
VMfyEgdz1J7C5Ws3VD8oi18=
=5ZqI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----