Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount

On Fri Jun 11, 2004 at 02:0057PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 10:36:56PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote: > > On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 08:45:11PM -0700, Ian Eure wrote: > > > > > > Yes, this is how I interpret it - that copyright notice says that the > > > license text is copyrighted by the PHP Group. > > > > I'm willing to wager two beers[1] that the copyright notice is about the > > code and not the license itself. > > On this segment of the discussion, considering the people who stared PEAR > are folks deeply involved in the PHP Group, I'm thinking that the header > text currently put forth by the coding standards was copied verbatim from > files that the PHP Group acually has copyright on. Therefore, the > "Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group" is merely an artifact. I believe you are correct. > Second, in general, we should probably update the header section of the > coding standards to explain this. Agreed. Do you want to take care of that? -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/